Debunking Myths: Common Misconceptions About Collaborative Robots

Debunking Myths: Common Misconceptions About Collaborative Robots


Myth 1: Cobots don’t have safety concerns. While collaborative robots are designed with safety in mind, including features such as force-limiting technology, sensors, and emergency stop functions, it is a misconception to think they are completely free from safety concerns. Cobots still require proper risk assessments and safety protocols to ensure a safe working environment. Integrating cobots involves considering the entire system, including how they interact with humans and other machinery, to mitigate any potential risks effectively.

Myth 2: Cobots replace human jobs. One of the most pervasive myths is that cobots take jobs away from humans. In reality, cobots are designed to work alongside humans, complementing their efforts rather than replacing them. Cobots handle repetitive, mundane, or hazardous tasks, allowing human workers to focus on more complex, creative, and higher-value activities. This collaboration often leads to job enrichment and the creation of new roles centered around robot management, maintenance, and optimization.

Myth 3: Cobots are expensive. Many believe that collaborative robots are a costly investment only accessible to large enterprises. However, the cost of cobots has been decreasing, making them more affordable for small and medium-sized businesses. Additionally, the return on investment (ROI) can be realized relatively quickly due to increased productivity, improved quality, and reduced labor costs. The affordability of cobots is further enhanced by their ease of deployment and low maintenance requirements.  There are even new business models on the market for leasing and hiring collaborative robots.

Myth 4: Cobots are inexpensive. Conversely, some people think cobots are a cheap solution. While they are more affordable compared to traditional industrial robots, it’s important to consider the total cost of ownership. This includes initial purchase price, integration costs, training, and potential modifications to the production line. Companies need to evaluate the specific needs of their operations to determine the true cost-effectiveness of cobots.

Myth 5: Cobots are too simple to be productive. Another common misconception is that cobots, due to their simplified programming and operation, are not capable of handling complex tasks. In reality, cobots are highly versatile and can be equipped with advanced end-effectors and software to perform a wide range of sophisticated tasks with precision. Their simplicity in programming actually enhances their productivity by allowing for quick re-deployment and adjustment to different tasks as needed.

Myth 6: Cobots are too complex for the inexperienced. On the flip side, there is a belief that cobots are too complicated for workers without a technical background. Modern cobots are designed with user-friendly interfaces and intuitive programming tools that make them accessible even to those with minimal robotics experience. Training programs and support from manufacturers further simplify the integration process, enabling companies to upskill their workforce effectively.

Collaborative robots are not without their share of myths, but a closer look reveals the transformative impact they can have on manufacturing and research. By dispelling these misconceptions, organizations can make informed decisions about integrating cobots into their workflows, paving the way for a more efficient, safer, and productive future in manufacturing.

 

If you have any questions or are just looking for some help, we're happy to discuss your application with you.  Reach out to us at (855) 737-4716 or fill out our online form.